AI CONTENT PLATFORM REVIEW: EVIDENCE RECORD

Platform / plan / date:
Reviewer:
Trial brief and source references:

Use one evidence label for each answer:
- Observed in our test account
- Shown in a vendor demonstration
- Described in current documentation
- Vendor assertion only
- Unknown / not available
Include the source, date and relevant account configuration. A feature name is not a verified outcome.

1. CREATIVE QUALITY
Asset version inspected:
Acceptance criteria:
Accuracy, readability, audio, edit continuity and delivery findings:
Requested revision and revised export:
Human effort / elapsed time / number of attempts (record separately):
Evidence label and source:

2. BUSINESS APPROVAL
Who approved which version, caption, offer and intended destination:
How changes after approval are handled:
Where the decision and comments are recorded:
Evidence label and source:

3. PUBLISHING CONTROLS
Who may draft, approve, schedule and publish:
Which channel and plan were demonstrated:
Can required approval be bypassed, by whom, and under what configuration:
What happens after rejection, late approval, media replacement or a disconnected channel:
Whether relevant actions are recorded:
Evidence label and source:

4. DECISION
Essential checks passed:
Unresolved questions and owner:
Accept / revise trial / choose another option:
Reason and next action:

Run permission demonstrations in a test workspace with disposable content and a test destination, not by attempting a live customer post. Record only information needed for the review. Keep account credentials and customer-sensitive material out of shared notes.
https://aitoma.ai/guides/evaluate-ai-content-platform